Mobile Web App Development for Diabetic Foot Screening Using Inlow’s 60-Second Screen with Automated Risk Classification

Authors

  • Suhendri Universitas Majalengka
  • Wildan Zhilal Manafi Universitas Majalengka
  • Bayu Reviyadi Universitas Majalengka
  • Sri Rahayu Universitas Majalengka
  • Iin Karmila Septiani Universitas Majalengka
  • Mita Nurmala Universitas Majalengka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37034/medinftech.v4i2.152

Keywords:

Automated Risk Classification, Clinical Decision Support System, Diabetic Foot Screening, Inlow’s 60-Second Screen, Mobile Web Application

Abstract

Diabetic foot complications constitute a major contributor to preventable lower-extremity amputation, yet primary care screening remains inconsistent due to the absence of integrated digital tools implementing validated clinical protocols. This study presents the design, implementation, and system-centric evaluation of Podiatrix, a mobile web application that operationalizes Inlow's 60-Second Diabetic Foot Screen through an automated, condition-based clinical workflow. Unlike existing tools that address isolated screening criteria, Podiatrix implements all seven Inlow criteria within a unified five-step wizard and applies a deterministic hierarchical classification engine that directly mirrors the original Inlow protocol logic rather than relying on fixed score thresholds. The system was evaluated using three complementary methods: black-box testing across 50 simulated clinical scenarios, Nielsen's heuristic usability evaluation conducted by three independent evaluators, and performance load testing using Apache JMeter under concurrent user conditions. Results demonstrated 100% classification accuracy (50/50 scenarios) matching manual Inlow protocol interpretation, an average heuristic severity score of 1.15 out of 4 indicating high usability, and a mean response time of 820 ms with less than 1% error rate under 100 concurrent users. These findings confirm that Podiatrix provides a computationally robust, highly usable, and scalable digital infrastructure that lays the groundwork for future prospective clinical trials in primary care and community health settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

International Diabetes Federation, IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK581934/

F. R. Muharram, J. B. Swannjo, R. R. Melbiarta, and S. Martini, “Trends of diabetes and pre-diabetes in Indonesia 2013–2023: a serial analysis of national health surveys,” BMJ Open, vol. 15, no. 9, p. e098575, 2025, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098575.

N. Singh, “Preventing Foot Ulcers in Patients With Diabetes,” JAMA, vol. 293, no. 2, pp. 217–228, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.217.

J. J. van Netten et al., “Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update),” Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., vol. 40, no. 3, p. e3651, 2024, doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3651.

N. C. Schaper et al., “Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetes-related foot disease (IWGDF 2023 update),” Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., vol. 40, no. 3, p. e3657, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3657.

T. Morris, F. Aspinal, J. Ledger, K. Li, and M. Gomes, “The Impact of Digital Health Interventions for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes on Health and Social Care Utilisation and Costs: A Systematic Review,” Pharmacoeconomics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 163–173, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00377-9.

Y. Zhang, Q. Qiu, W. Peng, Y. Zhou, Z. Wang, and X. Qi, “A comprehensive review of methods based on deep learning for diabetes-related foot ulcers,” Front. Endocrinol., vol. 13, p. 945020, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.945020.

S. A. Bus et al., “Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update),” Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., vol. 40, no. 3, p. e3647, 2024, doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3647.

S. Inlow, “The 60-Second Foot Exam for People with Diabetes,” Wound Care Can., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 10–12, 2004.

R. G. Sibbald, K. Mufti, and S. Inlow, “Clinical practice guidelines: Diabetic foot care,” Wound Care Can., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 45–52, 2003.

W. W. Royce, “Managing the Development of Large Software Systems: Concepts and Techniques,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Los Angeles, USA, 1987, pp. 328–338.

T. Otwell, “Laravel: The PHP Framework for Web Artisans.” Accessed: Jun. 05, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/laravel/laravel

S. A. Bus et al., “Standards for the development and methodology of the 2023 IWGDF guidelines,” Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., vol. 40, no. 3, p. e3656, 2024, doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3656.

R. Sandhu, D. Ferraiolo, and R. Kuhn, “The NIST Model for Role-Based Access Control: Towards a Unified Standard,” in Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control, Berlin, Germany: ACM, Jul. 2000, pp. 47–63. doi: 10.1145/344287.344301.

R. Fitridge et al., “The intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS guidelines on peripheral artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus and a foot ulcer,” Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., vol. 40, no. 3, p. e3702, 2024, doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3702.

K. McDermott, M. Fang, A. J. M. Boulton, E. Selvin, and C. W. Hicks, “Etiology, Epidemiology, and Disparities in the Burden of Diabetic Foot Ulcers,” Diabetes Care, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 209–221, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.2337/dci22-0043.

S. Sadler et al., “The Use of mHealth Apps for the Assessment and Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Health Outcomes: Systematic Review,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 25, p. e47608, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.2196/47608.

M. Hyzy, R. Bond, M. Mulvenna, L. Bai, A. Dix, S. Leigh, and S. Hunt, “System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-analysis,” JMIR mHealth Uhealth, vol. 10, no. 8, p. e37290, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.2196/37290.

A. L. Hripcsak and P. O. Alderson, "The Path from Development to Clinical Validation of Health IT Systems," J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1135–1137, 2021.

R. T. Fielding and R. N. Taylor, "Principled Design of the Modern Web Architecture," ACM Trans. Internet Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 115–150, May 2002, doi: 10.1145/514183.514185.

C. S. Kruse and N. Ehrbar, “Effects of Computerized Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: Systematic Review,” JMIR Medical Informatics, vol. 8, no. 8, p. e17283, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.2196/17283.

]V. L. Patel, D. R. Kaufman, and T. Kannampallil, “Human-Computer Interaction, Usability, and Workflow,” Biomedical Informatics, pp. 153–175, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58721-5_5.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

[1]
Suhendri, W. Z. Manafi, B. Reviyadi, S. Rahayu, I. K. Septiani, and M. Nurmala, “Mobile Web App Development for Diabetic Foot Screening Using Inlow’s 60-Second Screen with Automated Risk Classification”, MEDINFTech, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 70–80, Jun. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles